Numbers Matter
As a follow up to my previous posting about the election, I simply must take some time to yell at the two news sources I recommended. Since they don't read this blog you can just interpret this as venting.
Many people in America simply do not understand basic math. It is import that you, as news sources, have a duty to report the facts, and if you report the facts such that a majority of Americans misunderstand them, you aren't doing your job.
For those confused: Congress has recently been debating a $700 billion authorization of the Treasury to purchase illiquid assets off of Wall Street balance sheets.
Two things are incredibly relevant here:
- That number may go higher. This is bad news.
- That number is not the amount of money the government will "be out". This is the good news and the part most people don't understand.
According to David Loenhardt those mortgages are probably now valued (mathematically) at 75% of their original value. The problem right now is that because nobody is willing to buy, the few that are selling are selling for 25% of their original value.
You can see where I'm going with this. Most of these mortgages are going to be paid off. Even if several don't, a very large chunk of their original value will come through (thus the 75% estimate.) Even if Treasury paid 75 cents on the dollar for them (way higher than will likely happen) it is very very likely the US Government would break even. I can't say that enough: these mortgages still have value, and it is likely they have a great deal of value. But because there are no buyers right now they aren't selling: that's what illiquid means.
The government doesn't even need to pay 75 cents on the dollar, though. Most holders will probably sell for something much lower. (I'm gonna pull a number out of the air here and say... 50 cents on the dollar, becuase it makes the math easy.) Even if twice as many people foreclose as it looks like actually will, that kind of purchase would still let the government break even.
Now, will some bad things happen? Yes. But let's say the market is right, and they are really only worth 25 cents on the dollar and we buy at 50 cents on the dollar. That means out of our $700 billion, we'll only lose half: $350 billion. That's still a huge number, but is, for instance, lower than what we spent on the Iraq war last year (at $1 billion a day) so doesn't that make the number not seem like the apocalypse?
So, please, news organizations of America: please point out that we aren't buying worthless stuff for our $700 billion. This is a serious issue, worthy of serious discussion, but it's not what you're painting it to be.
