Negotiations and Love Songs
“two disappointed believers
two people playing the game
negotiations and love songs are often mistaken for one and the same.”
-Paul Simon, "Train in the Distance"
Nobody likes people that say "I told you so." Nonetheless: I told you so.
One debate topic back in high school (which, for me, was in *cough* 1990-1994) was about universal health care. It was a hot topic, and I was much more conservative then. One thing did bug me about my conservatism, though. It was the projections of what health care would cost American business if we remained largely insured by our employers and costs kept rising. They basically said American business would be unable to compete globally or insolvent (or both).
Now we're in the second round of bailouts. For some reason the media (even the New York Times, which should jump at the chance to point this out) are burying the simple connect-the-dots between the Big Three bailout and the lack of universal health coverage in the US. People outside the paper have had to do it for them (and who knew I'd ever be posting a link to analysis by Mitt Romney I'd be praising?) Today, a post on Timothy Egan's blog carries the story of an insolvent municipality, but buries their crazy health insurance coverage in paragraph 18!
And it is a simple connect-the-dots: other governments provide universal health care and can thus control their costs. The free lending of the mortgage boom was the finger that pushed the first domino, but frankly all the dominos are close together because of the shortsightedness of the American people to deal with their health care problem.
I love the free market for a lot of things, but I've come around since high school on this and told anybody who would sit still long enough to listen: we need universal health care. It's good for our health; it's good for the health industry; it's good for the competitiveness of American companies. Let's get over our strange flirtation with government provided health insurance through tax breaks to business and actually use the same money to provide universal health care.
two people playing the game
negotiations and love songs are often mistaken for one and the same.”
-Paul Simon, "Train in the Distance"
Nobody likes people that say "I told you so." Nonetheless: I told you so.
One debate topic back in high school (which, for me, was in *cough* 1990-1994) was about universal health care. It was a hot topic, and I was much more conservative then. One thing did bug me about my conservatism, though. It was the projections of what health care would cost American business if we remained largely insured by our employers and costs kept rising. They basically said American business would be unable to compete globally or insolvent (or both).
Now we're in the second round of bailouts. For some reason the media (even the New York Times, which should jump at the chance to point this out) are burying the simple connect-the-dots between the Big Three bailout and the lack of universal health coverage in the US. People outside the paper have had to do it for them (and who knew I'd ever be posting a link to analysis by Mitt Romney I'd be praising?) Today, a post on Timothy Egan's blog carries the story of an insolvent municipality, but buries their crazy health insurance coverage in paragraph 18!
And it is a simple connect-the-dots: other governments provide universal health care and can thus control their costs. The free lending of the mortgage boom was the finger that pushed the first domino, but frankly all the dominos are close together because of the shortsightedness of the American people to deal with their health care problem.
I love the free market for a lot of things, but I've come around since high school on this and told anybody who would sit still long enough to listen: we need universal health care. It's good for our health; it's good for the health industry; it's good for the competitiveness of American companies. Let's get over our strange flirtation with government provided health insurance through tax breaks to business and actually use the same money to provide universal health care.


